Article Open Access

Predicting Burnout in Start-Up Environments: A Multivariate Risk Scoring Approach for Early Managerial Intervention

Nos Sutrisno, Maricha Elveny, Andre Hasudungan Lubis, Rahmad Syah, Hartono Hartono, Sabina Krisdayanti

Abstract


Start-up organisations operate under fast timelines, lean staffing, and constantly shifting priorities, exposing employees to chronic workload pressure and emotional strain. Unmanaged burnout in these settings threatens individual well-being, talent retention, and long-term execution capacity. This study proposes a multivariate burnout risk scoring approach that aims to identify and prioritise employees at elevated risk before full deterioration occurs, enabling early managerial intervention rather than reactive recovery. The proposed pipeline integrates principal component analysis (PCA), Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine (SVM). PCA is first applied to reduce redundancy across workplace indicators, yielding five principal components (PC1–PC5) that together explain 88% of the total variance in self-reported stress level, job satisfaction, emotional exhaustion, work-life balance, performance, and social interaction. These components are then used as predictors in two supervised classification models, Random Forest and SVM, to estimate the likelihood that each employee belongs to a high-burnout-risk class. The Random Forest model achieved an accuracy of 88%, and the SVM model achieved an accuracy of 86%, demonstrating strong predictive capability in distinguishing higher-risk employees from lower-risk employees. The resulting predicted probability is interpreted as an individualised burnout risk score, which can be mapped to action categories such as workload redistribution, role clarification, targeted supervisory check-ins, or temporary protection from critical-path tasks. In this way, the framework operationalises burnout prediction not only as a detection task but also as an actionable decision-support signal for leaders. The study therefore offers both a quantitative method for forecasting burnout in start-up environments and a practical structure for translating prediction into preventive intervention.


Keywords


Employee Burnout, Principal Component Analysis, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Predictive Modelling.

References


. M. Genedy, K. Hellerstedt, L. Naldi, and J. Wiklund, “Growing pains in scale-ups: How scaling affects new venture employee burnout and job satisfaction,” J Bus Ventur, vol. 39, no. 2, p. 106367, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106367.

. R. B. Y. Syah, H. Satria, M. Elveny, and M. K. M. Nasution, “Complexity prediction model: a model for multi-object complexity in consideration to business uncertainty problems,” Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 3697–3705, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.11591/eei.v12i6.5380.

. A. H. L. M. E. L. N. M. S. I. R. S. NOS SUTRISNO, “PREDICTION MODEL BEHAVIOR BURNOUT AMONG MANAGERS AND EMPLOYEES OF START-UPS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology , vol. 101, no. 16, pp. 6616–6625, 2023.

. M. Elveny, M. K. M. Nasution, and R. B. Y. Syah, “A Hybrid Metaheuristic Model for Efficient Analytical Business Prediction,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 14, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140848.

. L.-C. Wu, C.-Y. Chou, and C.-Y. Kao, “Workplace Social Support as a Mediating Factor in the Association between Occupational Stressors and Job Burnout: A Study in the Taiwanese Nursing Context,” J Nurs Manag, vol. 2023, pp. 1–11, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/5599128.

. G. Xu, M. Xue, and J. Zhao, “The Association between Artificial Intelligence Awareness and Employee Depression: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and the Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 20, no. 6, p. 5147, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065147.

. C. Huang, Y. Tu, Z. Han, F. Jiang, F. Wu, and Y. Jiang, “Examining the relationship between peer feedback classified by deep learning and online learning burnout,” Comput Educ, vol. 207, p. 104910, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104910.

. S. Wyke, S. M. Lindhard, and J. K. Larsen, “Using principal component analysis to identify latent factors affecting cost and time overrun in public construction projects,” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 2415–2436, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1108/ECAM-02-2022-0189.

. Md. R. Ali, S. Md. A. Nipu, and S. A. Khan, “A decision support system for classifying supplier selection criteria using machine learning and random forest approach,” Decision Analytics Journal, vol. 7, p. 100238, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100238.

. H. Wang, G. Li, and Z. Wang, “Fast SVM classifier for large-scale classification problems,” Inf Sci (N Y), vol. 642, p. 119136, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2023.119136.

. M. Elveny, R. B. Y. Syah, and M. K. M. Nasution, “An boosting business intelligent to customer lifetime value with robust M-estimation,” IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI), vol. 13, no. 2, p. 1632, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijai.v13.i2.pp1632-1639.

. B. Govindaras, T. S. Wern, S. Kaur, I. A. Haslin, and R. K. Ramasamy, “Sustainable Environment to Prevent Burnout and Attrition in Project Management,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 2364, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15032364.

. D. J. Madigan, L. E. Kim, and H. L. Glandorf, “Interventions to reduce burnout in students: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 931–957, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10212-023-00731-3.

. S. Edú-Valsania, A. Laguía, and J. A. Moriano, “Burnout: A Review of Theory and Measurement,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 1780, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031780.

. P. Ray, S. S. Reddy, and T. Banerjee, “Various dimension reduction techniques for high dimensional data analysis: a review,” Artif Intell Rev, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 3473–3515, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10462-020-09928-0.

. N. Syam and R. Kaul, “Random Forest, Bagging, and Boosting of Decision Trees,” in Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Marketing and Sales, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2021, pp. 139–182. doi: 10.1108/978-1-80043-880-420211006.

. M. Mohammadi et al., “A comprehensive survey and taxonomy of the SVM-based intrusion detection systems,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 178, p. 102983, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2021.102983.

. E. Üngüren, N. Onur, H. Demirel, and Ö. A. Tekin, “The Effects of Job Stress on Burnout and Turnover Intention: The Moderating Effects of Job Security and Financial Dependency,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 322, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.3390/bs14040322.

. J. Van Heerden, M. Du Plessis, and J. R. Becker, “Walking the Tightrope of Job Demands and Resources: Leveraging Work Engagement to Counter Turnover Intentions of Information Technology Professionals,” Front Psychol, vol. 13, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.660308.

. E. Demerouti, “Burnout: a comprehensive review,” Z Arbeitswiss, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 492–504, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s41449-024-00452-3.

. W. Salama, A. H. Abdou, S. A. K. Mohamed, and H. S. Shehata, “Impact of Work Stress and Job Burnout on Turnover Intentions among Hotel Employees,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 19, no. 15, p. 9724, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159724.

. G. Mazzetti, C. Consiglio, F. P. Santarpia, L. Borgogni, D. Guglielmi, and W. B. Schaufeli, “Italian Validation of the 12-Item Version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT-12),” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 19, no. 14, p. 8562, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148562.

. K. Redelinghuys and B. Morgan, “Psychometric properties of the Burnout Assessment Tool across four countries,” BMC Public Health, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 824, May 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15604-z.

. L. T. De Beer, M. Christensen, T. A. Sørengaard, S. T. Innstrand, and W. B. Schaufeli, “The psychometric properties of the Burnout Assessment Tool in Norway: A thorough investigation into construct?relevant multidimensionality,” Scand J Psychol, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 479–489, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1111/sjop.12996.

. M. M. Van Zyl-Cillié, J. H. Bührmann, A. J. Blignaut, D. Demirtas, and S. K. Coetzee, “A machine learning model to predict the risk factors causing feelings of burnout and emotional exhaustion amongst nursing staff in South Africa,” BMC Health Serv Res, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 1665, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12184-5.

. D. Tawfik et al., “Predicting Primary Care Physician Burnout From Electronic Health Record Use Measures,” Mayo Clin Proc, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 1411–1421, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.01.005.

. I. Bes, Y. Shoman, M. Al-Gobari, V. Rousson, and I. Guseva Canu, “Organizational interventions and occupational burnout: a meta-analysis with focus on exhaustion,” Int Arch Occup Environ Health, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 1211–1223, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00420-023-02009-z.

. S. Marukatat, “Tutorial on PCA and approximate PCA and approximate kernel PCA,” Artif Intell Rev, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 5445–5477, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10462-022-10297-z.

. L. Ren, A. S. Seklouli, H. Zhang, T. Wang, and A. Bouras, “An adaptive Laplacian weight random forest imputation for imbalance and mixed-type data,” Inf Syst, vol. 111, p. 102122, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.is.2022.102122.

. S. Yang et al., “A novel hybrid adaptive framework for support vector machine-based reliability analysis: A comparative study,” Structures, vol. 58, p. 105665, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105665.

. D. Hong, F. Yang, J. A. Fessler, and L. Balzano, “Optimally Weighted PCA for High-Dimensional Heteroscedastic Data,” SIAM J Math Data Sci, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 222–250, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1137/22M1470244.

. A. Apicella, F. Isgrò, A. Pollastro, and R. Prevete, “On the effects of data normalization for domain adaptation on EEG data,” Eng Appl Artif Intell, vol. 123, p. 106205, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106205.

. X. He, “Principal Component Analysis (PCA),” in Geographic Data Analysis Using R, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2024, pp. 155–165. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-4022-2_8.

. R. Iranzad and X. Liu, “A review of random forest-based feature selection methods for data science education and applications,” Int J Data Sci Anal, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s41060-024-00509-w.

. I. M. S. Ali and D. Hariprasad, “Hyper-heuristic salp swarm optimization of multi-kernel support vector machines for big data classification,” International Journal of Information Technology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 651–663, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s41870-022-01141-2.

. R. Guido, M. C. Groccia, and D. Conforti, “A hyper-parameter tuning approach for cost-sensitive support vector machine classifiers,” Soft comput, vol. 27, no. 18, pp. 12863–12881, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00500-022-06768-8.

. F. Lin, S.-C. Fang, X. Fang, and Z. Gao, “Distributionally robust chance-constrained kernel-based support vector machine,” Comput Oper Res, vol. 170, p. 106755, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2024.106755.

. Y. Liu, H. Gu, and P. Qin, “Evaluating robustness of support vector machines with the Lagrangian dual approach,” Neural Comput Appl, vol. 36, no. 14, pp. 7991–8006, May 2024, doi: 10.1007/s00521-024-09490-8.

. H. Moosaei and M. Hladík, “A lagrangian-based approach for universum twin bounded support vector machine with its applications,” Ann Math Artif Intell, vol. 91, no. 2–3, pp. 109–131, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10472-022-09783-5.

. L. Vanneschi and S. Silva, “Support Vector Machines,” 2023, pp. 271–281. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-17922-8_10.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v5i4.1663

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Nos Sutrisno, Marischa Elveny, Andre Hasudungan Lubis, Rahmad Syah, Hartono, Sabina Krisdayanti

International Journal of Engineering, Science, and Information Technology (IJESTY) eISSN 2775-2674