The Study of Phisical Changes in Bireuen Pendopo (Case Study: Pre-Independence, Independence And After Area Expansion)

Cut Azmah Fithri, Mohammad S Arar, Shofia Farhan, Yenny Novianti

Abstract


Bireuen Regency is an area that has historical buildings from the Dutch colonial era, one of which is the Bireuen Pendopo. It is a cultural heritage building that is more than 70 years old based on the photo archive of Ir. Sukarno with the Bireuen fighter in 1948 and was certified as "The President Sukarno Heritage List". The building has undergone changes, seen from the period of pre-independence (1934–1944), the period of independence (1945–1999), and the period after the area expansion (1999–2021). Pendopo is a cultural heritage building. A study of its physical changes is urgently needed so that the original shape does not change and the material is not entirely replaced. The purpose of this study is to identify the physical changes in the Bireun Pendopo building. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. The physical elements are categorized into minor transformation, major transformation, and full transformation. The study's results found that the Bireun Pendopo building in the pre-independence period (1934-1944) did not have any changes in its physical form. While during the independence period (1945-1998), it underwent a minor physical transformation. In the period after the expansion of Bireun Regency (1999-2020), it underwent a minor physical transformation, a major transformation, and a full transformation. The results of the study that identified the physical changes of the Bireun Pendopo based on three periods showed that most of the changes were carried out in the post-expansion period with major and full transformation categories.


Keywords


Physical Changes, Pendopo, Historic Buildings.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Pemerintah Kabupaten Bireuen, Qanun Kabupaten Bireuen Nomor 10 Tahun 2014 Tentang Gedung. Indonesia, 2014.

Pemerintah Kabupaten Bireuen, Qanun Kabupaten Bireuen Nomor 7 Tahun 2013 Tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabu-paten Bireuen Tahun 2012-2032. Indonesia, 2013.

G. Faisal and Y. Firzal, “Transformasi Identitas Arsitektur Vernakular Pesisir Tinjauan Kasus Permukiman Suku Akit Di Pulau Rupat,” Proseding Semin. Kearifan Lokal Dan Lingkung. Binaan, no. May, pp. 455–464, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316682366.

N. J. Habraken, Transformations of the Site. Awater Press, 1983.

J. Prijotomo, “(Re- )konstruksi arsitektur Jawa : griya Jawa dalam tradisi tanpatulisan,” p. 440, 2006, [Online]. Available: http://www.worldcat.org/title/re-konstruksi-arsitektur-jawa-griya-jawa-dalam-tradisi-tanpatulisan/oclc/196260650&referer=brief_results.

G. Susilo, “Ransformasi Bentuk Arsitektur Jawa,” Spectra, vol. XIII, no. 25, pp. 13–26, 2015.

M. Sesotyaningtyas, W. D. Pratiwi, and J. S. Setyono, “Transformasi Hunian Dengan Perspektif Spasial Dan Tatanan Budaya: Komparasi Permukiman Kumuh Bang Bua, Thailand Dan Kampung Naga, Indonesia,” Geoplanning J. Geomatics Plan., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 116–123, 2015, doi: 10.14710/geoplanning.2.2.116-123.

A. Rapoport, “The Evidence,” in History and Precedent in Environmental Design, Springer, 1990, pp. 297–311.

S. J. Najoan and J. Mandey, “Transformasi Sebagai Strategi Desain,” Media Matrasain, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/295355498.pdf.

Luthfiah, “Perubahan bentuk dan fungsi hunian pada rumah susun pasca penghunian,” J. Ruang, vol. 2, no. September, p. 221026, 2010, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/RUANG/article/view/728.

W. Kurniawati, N. Nurini, D. I. K. Dewi, and R. R. B. Rahmat, “Identifikasi Transformasi Fisik Berdasarkan House Extension di Kampung Sekayu Kota Semarang,” J. Planol., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 1, 2020, doi: 10.30659/jpsa.v17i1.7555.

I. S. Susanti, N. I. Komala Dewi, and A. Y. Permana, “Tatanan Teritorial dalam Proses Transformasi Hunian,” J. Arsit. Zo., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 27, 2018, doi: 10.17509/jaz.v1i1.11542.

E. Durmisevic, “Transformable Building Structures,” Delft Univ. Technol., p. 42, 2006, [Online]. Available: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:9d2406e5-0cce-4788-8ee0-c19cbf38ea9a.

Y. B. Mangunwijaya, “Wastu citra: Pengantar ke ilmu budaya bentuk arsitektur,” Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1992.

D. Sumintardja, “Kompedium Arsitektur Indonesia,” Parahiyangan Bandung, 1981.

Maria I Hidayatun, “PENDOPO DALAM ERA MODERNISASI : Bentuk Fungsi dan Makna Pendopo pada Arsitektur Tradi-sional Jawa dalam Perubahan Kebudayaan,” Dimens. (Jurnal Tek. Arsitektur), vol. 27, no. 1, 1999, [Online]. Available: http://puslit2.petra.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/ars/article/view/15706.

A. S. Muljadinata, “Penerapan Konsep Tradisional Pendopo Bangunan SMA Van Deventer Karya Seminar Nasional Jelajah Arsi-tektur Tradisional 2017 Penerapan Konsep Tradisional Pendopo Bangunan SMA Van Deventer Karya Karsten,” no. September, 2017.

S. Marhaban, “Women in Post-conflict Aceh: Participation in Socio-economic and Political Processes,” Weather. Cent. Int. Aff. Harvard Univ. Cambridge, no. March, pp. 25–27, 2018.

R. Jannah, “Perjuangan Masyarakat Bireuen Pada Masa Revolusi Kemerdekaan (1945-1949),” Thisis. Unsam, 2017.

Prof. Dr. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta, 2011.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v2i4.294

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Cut Azmah Fithri, Mohammad S. Arar, Shofia Farhan, Yenny Novianti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology (IJESTY) eISSN 2775-2674