UX Matters: Unlocking QRIS Adoption among MSMEs in the Greater Jakarta Area
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of User Experience (UX) dimensions, integrated with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), on the adoption intention of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in the Greater Jakarta area toward the Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS). The research examines functional qualities, which consist of Efficiency, Perspicuity, and Dependability, alongside hedonic qualities, represented by Stimulation and Novelty, as well as Trust, which serves as an essential construct in the adoption process of financial technologies. These factors were evaluated as direct predictors of adoption behaviour, while Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) were employed as mediating variables to capture the mechanisms underlying the relationships, consistent with TAM’s theoretical framework. Data were collected from 400 MSMEs across various industries in the region, and analysis was conducted using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The empirical results demonstrate that Efficiency strongly drives PU, emphasising the critical role of task performance and functional reliability in shaping perceptions of usefulness. Dependability and Trust significantly improve PEOU, highlighting that stable system performance and confidence in technology providers reduce complexity and foster ease of use. Interestingly, while Stimulation shows a positive and direct impact on Intention to Use, Perspicuity and Novelty yield unexpected negative effects, suggesting that overly simple or overly unfamiliar experiences may hinder rather than encourage adoption. Furthermore, PU and PEOU are shown to mediate several causal paths, reinforcing TAM’s theoretical assumptions and underscoring the value of integrating UX considerations into classical acceptance models. The final structural model exhibits strong explanatory power, with an R² of 0.903 for Intention to Use, indicating the robustness of the integrated framework and confirming the effectiveness of combining UX dimensions with TAM in explaining QRIS adoption behaviour among MSMEs.
Keywords
References
Bank Indonesia, “Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS),” 2019.
Ariza, F., & Rahmawati, N., “User experience challenges in QRIS adoption by MSMEs,” 2024.
Putra, A., et al., “Adoption factors of QRIS in small businesses,” 2022.
Jusman, R., & Fauziah, D., “Trust and security in digital payment adoption,” 2024.
Garcia, R., & Hernandez, M., “Security and trust in e-payment systems,” 2019.
Sholihah, H., & Nurhapsari, A., “Factors influencing QRIS adoption in MSMEs,” 2022.
Najib, M., & Fahma, F., “Determinants of digital payment adoption in Indonesia,” 2020.
Nisa, S., & Adinugraha, H.H., “Digital literacy barriers in fintech adoption,” 2024.
Mlekus, L., et al., “Integrating UX into technology acceptance models,” 2020.
Oliveira, T., et al., “Mobile payment adoption: An empirical study,” 2016.
Laugwitz, B., Held, T., & Schrepp, M., “Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire,” 2008.
Schrepp, M., et al., “Design and validation of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ),” 2014.
Rahayu, N., & Aransyah, M., “Evaluating QRIS user experience in Samarinda City using UEQ,” 2023.
Cyr, D., “Modeling website design across cultures: Relationships to trust, satisfaction, and e-loyalty,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 2008.
Park, E., & Kim, K.J., “The role of UX in mobile service adoption,” Telematics and Informatics, 2014.
Davis, F.D., “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, 1989.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H., “Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions,” Decision Sciences, 2008.
Pavlou, P.A., “Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2003.
Gefen, D., et al., “Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model,” MIS Quarterly, 2003.
Kim, C., et al., “A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce,” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2008.
Van Deursen, A.J.A.M., & van Dijk, J.A.G.M., “The digital divide shifts to differences in usage,” New Media & Society, 2014.
OECD, “Skills for a Digital World,” 2016.
UNESCO, “A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2,” 2018.
Hassenzahl, M., “The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products,” Human-Computer Interaction, 2004.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D., “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS Quarterly, 2003.
Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., & Thomaschewski, J., “Design and evaluation of a short version of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S),” International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 2017.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P., “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model,” Information & Management, 2003.
Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M., “Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance,” Long Range Planning, 2013.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R., Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 2016.
Hair, J.F., et al., “PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2011.
Chin, W.W., “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling,” Modern Methods for Business Research, 1998.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F., “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1981.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sinkovics, R.R., “The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing,” Advances in International Marketing, 2009.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v5i4.1337
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Daffa Ramadhan, Ahmad Nurul Fajar



























