Project Scheduling Analysis Using the Precedence Diagram Method (PDM) Case Study: Surabaya’s City Outer East Ring Road Construction Project (Segment 1)

Syahrur Romadhona, Fredy Kurniawan, Julistyana Tistogondo

Abstract


The project acceleration by the Crash Program is one of the ways that is often used to make time and cost efficiency on an ongoing project. Acceleration of project completion time will affect the efficiency of equipment and labor productivity. In the case study of the Surabaya Outer East Ring Road Project Construction Segment 1, a project that has the potential to be accelerated is discussed in order to obtain efficiency values in terms of time and cost, Project acceleration by means of the Crash Program using the Precedence Diagram Method (PDM) method to determine the value of efficiency. This project uses resources, in this research the software used is Microsoft Project 2016. The research method used is to design network planning, find the critical path for each job, determine the work that has the potential to be accelerated, calculate the crash cost in additional working hours. and work shifts, calculating direct costs and indirect costs for each activity that changes due to changes in the duration of implementation, calculating the cost slope. Application of the Crash Program in the work of Asphalt Concrete Surface Layers (AC) thick 5 cm in the project will have an impact on increasing the time efficiency previously planned from 180 working days to 175 working days and efficiency with the difference in project costs of Rp. 18.313.935,8 with a ratio of 0,997 between the PDM method compared to the cost of the contract value calculated using the crashing project method.

Keywords


Project acceleration, efficiency, Precedence Diagram Method, Crash Program, Crashing

Full Text:

PDF

References


I. P. Setiadi and A. Andi, “MONITORING DAN ANALISIS JADWAL PROYEK MENGGUNAKAN METODE PERFORMANCE INTENSITY DAN CPM PADA PROYEK HOTEL,†Dimens. Utama Tek. Sipil, vol. 5, no. 2, 2018, doi: 10.9744/duts.5.2.17-25.

M. N. Ihwanudin, “ANALISA PENJADWALAN PROYEK PIPA CARBON DENGAN METODE FUZZY LOGIC APPLICATION FOR SCHEDULING,†Stat. F. Theor, vol. 53, no. 9, 2017.

N. M.T., “ANALISA BIAYA DAN PENJADWALAN PADA PROYEK PENATAAN BANGUNAN KAWASAN STRATEGIS MASJID RAYA SUMBAR KOTA PADANG,†Rang Tek. J., vol. 1, no. 2, 2018, doi: 10.31869/rtj.v1i2.769.

I. T. Derka, H. Suyoso, and A. Ratnaningsih, “A SCHEDULING ON IMPLEMENTATION OF ISDB PROJECT JEMBER UNIVERSITY WITH PRECEDENCE DIAGRAM METHOD,†J. Rekayasa Sipil dan Lingkung., vol. 3, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.19184/jrsl.v3i2.11089.

“Determination of Critical Pattern of 60 Meter Ship Construction Project Using Precedence Diagram Method (PDM),†Int. J. Syst. Appl. Eng. Dev., vol. 14, 2020, doi: 10.46300/91015.2020.14.14.

I. Soeharto, “Manajemen proyek (Dari konseptual sampai operasional),†J. Korean Phys. Soc., vol. 60, no. 5, 2012.

I. Soeharto, “Manajemen Proyek Jilid 1 (Dari Konseptual sampai Operasional),†in Manajemen Proyek Jilid 1 (Dari Konseptual sampai Operasional), vol. 60, no. 5, 1999.

I. A. Permatasari and J. H. Wijaya, “THE COMPARISON OF FOOD POLICY ERA THE LEADERSHIP OF SOEHARTO AND SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO,†J. Kebijak. Pembang. Drh., vol. 2, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.37950/jkpd.v2i1.35.

W. Ervianto, “Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi-Edisi Revisi,†Manaj. Proy. Konstr. Revisi, 2006.

W. I. Ervianto, “Tantangan Pembangunan Infrastruktur dalam Proyek Strategis Nasional Indonesia,†Simp. II UNIID 2017, vol. 2, no. 1, 2017.

Ir. Iman Soeharto, “Manajemen Proyek Jilid 1 (Dari Konseptual sampai Operasional),†Manaj. Proy. Jilid 1 (Dari Konseptual sampai Oper., vol. 60, no. 5, 1999, doi: 10.3938/jkps.60.674.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v1i2.56

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 801 times
PDF - 1043 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Syahrur Romadhona, Fredy Kurniawan, Julistyana Tistogondo

International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology (IJESTY) eISSN 2775-2674