Analysis of the Relationship of Domestic Sea Transportation to the Gross Regional Domestic Product of the Real Estate Sector in Indonesia

Firda Bunga Nur Alfionita, M Ikhsan Setiawan, Adi Prawito, Koespiadi Koespiadi, Ronny Durrotun N, Ismawati Ismawati, I Ketut Sutapa

Abstract


The economic slowdown due to the pandemic has negatively affected various sectors in Indonesia, including the real estate sector. Meanwhile, Java Island is still the center of the economy in Indonesia. This contrasts the conditions of regions outside Java, which are still experiencing development gaps. Despite being a minor contributor to GDP, areas outside Java, such as Maluku and Papua, have experienced rapid economic growth. This proves that, outside Java, there is still significant potential for growth and investment, although it is inevitable that it will face unique challenges and obstacles in the future. Some of the factors that cause this to happen are the lack of supporting infrastructure such as roads, limited skilled human resources, and connectivity and transportation mobilization in the area. Excellent and appropriate connectivity and mobilization are needed to support economic growth in an area. One option for mobilization tools for archipelagic countries like Indonesia is sea transportation. In meeting the needs of the property and real estate sector, sea transportation is one of the options of choice. Excellent and proper connectivity and mobilization can be a factor that supports economic growth as well as the real estate sector outside Java. In the real estate sector, maritime transportation is essential in the timely distribution of quality building materials and construction equipment to development sites. There is undoubtedly a link between marine transportation and property/real estate in Indonesia. The research method used in this study is a significant correlation analysis, namely Pearson Product Moment, to determine the relationship between two variables, namely Domestic Sea Transportation and Real Estate Sector GRDP. The results of the correlation data test in this study show that the Domestic Sea Transportation variable is positively correlated with the Real Estate GRDP variable. Indicated by the correlation coefficient value for each sea transportation variable of domestic ship visits (units) = 0.331, domestic ship visits (GT) = 0.504, the flow of Non-Crate and Container goods (unloading) = 0.251, the flow of Non-Crate and Container goods (loading) = 0.447. It can be interpreted that there is a positive relationship between the four sea transportation variables and Real Estate GRDP.


Keywords


Sea Transportation, Real Estate GRDP, Flow of Goods, Passenger Visits

Full Text:

PDF

References


N. Akbulaev and G. Bayramli, “Maritime transport and economic growth: Interconnection and influence (an example of the countries in the Caspian sea coast; Russia, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, and Iran),” Mar. Policy, vol. 118, no. April, p. 104005, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104005.

J. S. Park, Y. J. Seo, and M. H. Ha, “The role of maritime, land, and air transportation in economic growth: Panel evidence from OECD and non-OECD countries,” Res. Transp. Econ., vol. 78, no. February, p. 100765, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2019.100765.

M. Mualim and S. B. Awom, “Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan, Pembangunan Infrastruktur Dan Pembangunan Real Estate Terhadap Tingkat Serapan Tenaga Kerja Di Provinsi Papua Barat Tahun 2010-2014,” JFRES J. Fisc. Reg. Econ. Stud., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2019, doi: 10.36883/jfres.v2i1.23.

M. Özer, ?. Canbay, and M. K?rca, “The impact of container transport on economic growth in Turkey: An ARDL bounds testing approach,” Res. Transp. Econ., vol. 88, no. November 2019, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2020.101002.

A. D. Bolganbayev, “Analysis of the relationship between gross domestic product (GDP) and development of the transport industry in Kazakhstan,” Bull. Karaganda Univ. Econ. Ser., vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 14–24, 2020, doi: 10.31489/2020ec3/14-24.

R. Jayathilaka et al., “Gross domestic product and logistics performance index drive the world trade: A study based on all continents,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 3 March, pp. 1–16, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264474.

A. Rakhman, Neneng, A. Saputri, and A. A. Fisu, “Pengaruh pelabuhan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi di pulau sulawesi,” p. 15, 2020.

R. Gunawan, Z. Lubis, S. Kusnasari, and R. Kustini, “Sumatera Utara the Role of the Port in Driving the Flow of Goods and Economic Growth,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2021.

L. C. L. Teh, W. W. L. Cheung, and R. Sumaila, “Assessing the Economic Contribution of Ocean-Based Activities Using the Pacific Coast of British Columbia as a Case Study,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 14, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14148662.

A. L. Dewa, N. SBM, M. Thohir, and I. Susilowati, “Analysis of seaport efficiency in supporting inter-island transportation,” Econ. J. Emerg. Mark., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2018, doi: 10.20885/ejem.vol10.iss1.art6.

M. A. Agüero-Tobar, M. C. González-Araya, and R. G. González-Ramírez, “Assessment of maritime operations efficiency and its economic impact based on data envelopment analysis: A case study of Chilean ports,” Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., no. March, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100821.

C. Amin, H. Mulyati, E. Anggraini, and T. Kusumastanto, “Impact of maritime logistics on archipelagic economic development in eastern Indonesia,” Asian J. Shipp. Logist., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 157–164, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2021.01.004.

A. Fratila, I. A. Gavril, S. C. Nita, and A. Hrebenciuc, “The importance of maritime transport for economic growth in the European Union: A panel data analysis,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 1–23, 2021, doi 10.3390/su13147961.

R. Yildiz, “A Case Study of Examining the Relationships Between Maritime Foreign Trade , GDP , and the Construction in Turkey Denizyolu D?? Ticareti ?le GSY?H Ve Yap? Sektörü Aras?ndaki ?li?kilerin ?ncelenmesine Yönelik Türkiye Örne?i Öz,” pp. 0–1, 2022, doi: 10.48146/odusobiad.1093034.

N. A. Michail, “World Economic Growth and Seaborne Trade Volume: Quantifying The Relationship,” Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect., vol. 4, p. 100108, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100108.

N. Saeed, K. Cullinane, and S. Sødal, “Exploring the relationships between maritime connectivity, international trade and domestic production,” Marit. Policy Manag., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 497–511, 2021, doi: 10.1080/03088839.2020.1802783.

A. D. Ayunia, N. Nofrisel, and I. M. Adnyana, “Sektor Transportasi pada Angkutan Barang dalam Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia,” J. Manaj. Transp. Logistik, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 192, 2021, doi: 10.54324/j.mtl.v7i3.413.

J. M. Lane and M. Pretes, “Maritime dependency and economic prosperity: Why access to oceanic trade matters,” Mar. Policy, vol. 121, no. September, p. 104180, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104180.

A. B. Carvalho and G. Inácio de Moraes, “The Brazilian coastal and marine economies: Quantifying and measuring marine economic flow by input-output matrix analysis,” Ocean Coast. Manag., vol. 213, no. March, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105885.

Y. Wang, “The correlation between GDP and different transport modes turnover based on grey correlation analysis,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1486, no. 7, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1486/7/072008.

A. Kalinichenko, “The Impact of Investments in Indonesian Maritime Sector on Country’s Domestic Economy,” Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2017.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v4i1.486

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Firda Bunga Nur Alfionita, M Ikhsan Setiawan, Adi Prawito, Koespiadi Koespiadi, Ronny Durrotun N, Ismawati Ismawati

International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology (IJESTY) eISSN 2775-2674