Article Open Access

An Explainable Optimization Framework for Demand-Driven Inventory Decisions Using SHAP and Mixed Integer Programming

Alfry Aristo Jansen Sinlae, Fajriana Fajriana, Yenny Suzana, Kiki Puspo Arianty

Abstract


Demand uncertainty complicates inventory decision-making and requires decision-support systems that are both accurate and transparent. However, existing studies primarily emphasize either demand forecasting or inventory optimization, with limited attention to integrating explainability into a unified decision-making framework. This study develops and evaluates an Explainable Optimization Framework that combines Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for demand forecasting, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for model interpretability, and Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) for inventory optimization. The framework was developed following the Design Science Research methodology, encompassing problem identification, artifact development, demonstration, evaluation, and communication. Model performance was assessed using rolling-origin backtesting to provide a robust evaluation under dynamic and uncertain demand conditions. Forecasting accuracy was measured using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). Experimental results demonstrate that XGBoost achieved the highest forecasting accuracy, with an RMSE of 43.87, MAE of 33.92, and MAPE of 7.61%. The forecasted demand was subsequently incorporated into the MIP optimization model, resulting in a 22.3% reduction in total inventory cost, an increase in service level from 91.2% to 96.8%, an improvement in fill rate from 89.7% to 95.4%, a 57.1% reduction in stockout frequency, and an increase in inventory turnover from 5.8 to 7.2 compared with the baseline approach. SHAP analysis identified historical demand, promotional activities, and product price as the most influential variables affecting demand predictions, providing transparent explanations that enhance managerial trust and support informed inventory decisions. Overall, the proposed framework demonstrates that integrating forecasting, explainability, and mathematical optimization into a unified decision pipeline significantly improves operational efficiency, inventory performance, decision transparency, and resilient data-driven supply chain management across diverse industrial sectors


Keywords


Optimization, SHAP, Integer, Forecasting, XGBoost

References


Kumar, N., Rabbani, Q., & Khan, N. A. (2024). Efficient customer service and operation maintenance by inventory management. Journal of Mechanics of Continua and Mathematical Sciences, 19(9), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2024.09.00007

Bertsimas, D., Kallus, N., & Hussain, A. (2016). Inventory management in the era of big data. Production and Operations Management, 25(12), 2006–2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.2_12637

Guo, S., Choi, T. M., Shen, B., & Jung, S. (2018). Inventory management in mass customization operations: A review. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 66(3), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2839616

Namazian, Z., Betts, J. M., & Stuckey, P. J. (2025). Predict and optimize: A smart inventory management model for beauty retail. Optimization Letters, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-025-02226-0

Agrawal, P. M., & Sharda, R. (2012). Impact of frequency of alignment of physical and information system inventories on out of stocks: A simulation study. International Journal of Production Economics, 136(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.008

Roosevelt, S. C., Veemaraj, E., & Kirubakaran, S. (2024). Real time stock inventory management system. 2024 8th International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC), 166–170. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISC62624.2024.00034

Syed, S. (2021). Smart inventory management systems using RFID and IoT technologies for real-time stock visibility. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Transformation, 2(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJAIET.2021.2.1.22-36

Selwin, S., Mohammed, I., Tiwari, K., Sharma, R., & Deepika, P. (2025). Industrial IoT enabling model predictive control for dynamic inventory management in smart warehousing. 2025 Tenth International Conference on Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (ICONSTEM). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONSTEM65670.2025.11374867

Lee, H. (2019). Effective dynamic control strategy of a key supplier with multiple downstream manufacturers using industrial Internet of Things and cloud system. Processes, 7(3), 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7030172

Valencia-Cárdenas, M., Díaz-Serna, F. J., & Correa-Morales, J. C. (2015). Inventory planning with dynamic demand: A state of art review. Dyna, 82(190), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v82n190.42828

Babaï, M. Z., Syntetos, A. A., Dallery, Y., & Nikolopoulos, K. (2009). Dynamic re-order point inventory control with lead-time uncertainty: Analysis and empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Research, 47(9), 2461–2483. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701666824

Tadayonrad, Y., & Ndiaye, A. B. (2023). A new key performance indicator model for demand forecasting in inventory management considering supply chain reliability and seasonality. Supply Chain Analytics, 3, 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2023.100026

Kumar, L., Khedlekar, S., & Khedlekar, U. K. (2024). A comparative assessment of Holt-Winter exponential smoothing and autoregressive integrated moving average for inventory optimization in supply chains. Supply Chain Analytics, 8, 100084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2024.100084

Lejarza, F., Kelley, M. T., & Baldea, M. (2022). Feedback-based deterministic optimization is a robust approach for supply chain management under demand uncertainty. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 61(33), 12153–12168. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00099

Raghuram, P., Bhupesh, S., Manivannan, R., Anand, P. S. P., & Sreedharan, V. R. (2022). Modeling and analyzing the inventory level for demand uncertainty in the VUCA world: Evidence from biomedical manufacturer. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(8), 2944–2954. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3201440

Mitra, A., Jain, A., Kishore, A., & Kumar, P. (2022, September). A comparative study of demand forecasting models for a multi-channel retail company: A novel hybrid machine learning approach. Operations Research Forum, 3(4), 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-022-00166-4

Goltsos, T. E., Syntetos, A. A., Glock, C. H., & Ioannou, G. (2022). Inventory–forecasting: Mind the gap. European Journal of Operational Research, 299(2), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.07.040

Sim, M., Tang, Q., Zhou, M., & Zhu, T. (2025). The analytics of robust satisficing: Predict, optimize, satisfice, then fortify. Operations Research, 73(5), 2708–2728. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.0199

Tungadi, A. R., Dyah, S., Aurachman, R., & Santosa, B. (2019). Proposal of product-replenishment policy determination on multi-source problems to minimize over stock in DC PT. XYZ Area Bandung using mixed-integer programming method. International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System, 3(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.25124/ijies.v3i01.31

Hariga, M., Al-Ahmari, A., & Mohamed, A.-R. (2007). A joint optimisation model for inventory replenishment, product assortment, shelf space and display area allocation decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(1), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.025

Gupta, S., Bagga, S., & Sharma, D. K. (2020). Intelligent data analysis: Black box versus white box modeling. In Intelligent Data Analysis: From Data Gathering to Data Comprehension (pp. 1–15). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119544487.ch1

Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Giannotti, F., Pedreschi, D., Ruggieri, S., & Turini, F. (2019). Factual and counterfactual explanations for black box decision making. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 34(6), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2019.2957223

Wanner, J., Herm, L. V., Heinrich, K., & Janiesch, C. (2022). The effect of transparency and trust on intelligent system acceptance: Evidence from a user-based study. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2079–2102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00593-5

Mathew, D. E., Ebem, D. U., Ikegwu, A. C., Ukeoma, P. E., & Dibiaezue, N. F. (2025). Recent emerging techniques in explainable artificial intelligence to enhance the interpretability and understanding of AI models for humans. Neural Processing Letters, 57(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-025-11732-2

Padarian, J., McBratney, A. B., & Minasny, B. (2020). Game theory interpretation of digital soil mapping convolutional neural networks. Soil, 6(2), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-389-2020

Han, X., Zhang, Z., Cheng, P., Qian, X., Liu, Y., & Lin, B. (2025). Application and analysis of the Shapley additive explanations in predicting the rate of penetration. Petroleum Science and Technology, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2025.2594719

De Bock, K. W., Coussement, K., De Caigny, A., S?owi?ski, R., Baesens, B., Boute, R. N., ... & Weber, R. (2024). Explainable AI for operational research: A defining framework, methods, applications, and a research agenda. European Journal of Operational Research, 317(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.09.026

Bergsma, R., de Ruijt, C., & Bhulai, S. (2025). A systematic review of machine learning approaches in inventory control optimization. Operations Research Perspectives, 100367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2025.100367

Shajalal, M., Boden, A., & Stevens, G. (2022). Explainable product backorder prediction exploiting CNN: Introducing explainable models in businesses. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2107–2122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00599-z

Ponce-Bobadilla, A. V., Schmitt, V., Maier, C. S., Mensing, S., & Stodtmann, S. (2024). Practical guide to SHAP analysis: Explaining supervised machine learning model predictions in drug development. Clinical and Translational Science, 17(11), e70056. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70056

Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302

Prak, D., & Teunter, R. (2019). A general method for addressing forecasting uncertainty in inventory models. International Journal of Forecasting, 35(1), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2017.11.004

Song, J. S., Zhang, H., Hou, Y., & Wang, M. (2010). The effect of lead time and demand uncertainties in (r, q) inventory systems. Operations Research, 58(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1090.0711

Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

Absi, N., & Kedad-Sidhoum, S. (2007). MIP-based heuristics for multi-item capacitated lot-sizing problem with setup times and shortage costs. RAIRO-Operations Research, 41(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro:2007014

Jiang, Y., Shi, C., & Shen, S. (2019). Service level constrained inventory systems. Production and Operations Management, 28(9), 2365–2389. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13060

Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J. M., Nair, B., Katz, R., Himmelfarb, J., Bansal, N., & Lee, S.-I. (2020). From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9

Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., ... & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012

Kamble, S., Kalsarpe, K., & Dagadkar, S. N. (2026). Enhancing retail sales intelligence through XAI and interactive visualization. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sentiment Analysis and Deep Learning (ICSADL), 450–455. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSADL67539.2026.11451846

Choudhary, S. (2024). AI-powered integrated model for optimizing inventory decisions using deep learning. International Journal of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.33545/27076571.2024.v5.i1b.262

Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

Cortes, C., Mohri, M., & Storcheus, D. (2019). Regularized gradient boosting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 1117–1127.

Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

He, J., & Hahn, R. (2020). Stochastic tree ensembles for regularized nonlinear regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115(531), 1132–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2019.1660177

Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2021). Forecasting: Principles and Practice (3rd ed.). OTexts. https://otexts.com/fpp3/

Ruf, J., & Wang, W. (2021). Information leakage in backtesting. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3854093

Nohara, Y., Matsumoto, K., Soejima, H., & Nakashima, N. (2021). Explanation of machine learning models using improved Shapley Additive Explanations for predicting cerebral infarction. Scientific Reports, 11, 3827. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83151-9

Scheda, R., & Diciotti, S. (2022). Explainable AI in radiomics: Stability of SHAP explanations across cross-validation. Diagnostics, 12(9), 2166. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12092166

Kostopoulos, G., Davrazos, G., & Kotsiantis, S. (2024). Explainable Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support Systems: A Recent Review. Electronics, 13(14), 2842. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142842

Saranya, A., & Subhashini, R. (2023). A systematic review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence models and applications: Recent developments and future trends. Decision Analytics Journal, 7, 100230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100230

Wang, X., & Petropoulos, F. (2016). To select or to combine? The inventory performance of model and expert forecasts. International Journal of Production Research, 54(17), 5275–5287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1173259

Tadayonrad, Y., & Ndiaye, A. B. (2023). A new key performance indicator model for demand forecasting in inventory management considering supply chain reliability and seasonality. Supply Chain Analytics, 3, 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2023.100026

Bergsma, R., de Ruijt, C., & Bhulai, S. (2025). A systematic review of machine learning approaches in inventory control optimization. Operations Research Perspectives, 100367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2025.100367

Swathi, S., & Kalaiarasi, K. (2023). An integrated approach of Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Machine Learning (ML), and Fuzzy Logic for revolutionizing inventory management in modern supply chains. Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology, 44(3), 3827–3839. https://doi.org/10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i3.2129

Jadhav, B., Deshpande, A., & Jadhav, S. (2025). Integrating data analysis and predictive analytics into an advanced inventory management system using machine learning and deep learning to address backorders. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis, 32. https://doi.org/10.52783/cana.v32.3813

Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2016). FEDS: A framework for evaluation in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.36

Adam, M. T. P., Gregor, S., Hevner, A., & Morana, S. (2021). Design science research modes in human-computer interaction projects. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00139




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v6i3.1882

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Alfry Aristo Jansen Sinlae, Fajriana, Yenny Suzana, Kiki Puspo Arianty

International Journal of Engineering, Science, and Information Technology (IJESTY) eISSN 2775-2674