Article Open Access

Beyond Proof of Concept: A Structured Economic Framework for Governing AI Value Realization in Enterprise Cloud Architectures

Kiran Kumar Jaghni

Abstract


Despite sustained growth in enterprise artificial intelligence (AI) investment, relatively few organizations achieve measurable business value from production-scale deployments. Industry evidence indicates that most enterprises have yet to demonstrate significant financial returns from AI initiatives, while a substantial proportion of projects fail to progress beyond pilot or proof-of-concept stages. This persistent value gap is primarily architectural rather than algorithmic, reflecting the absence of governance-first decision frameworks capable of evaluating AI suitability before investment, accounting for the full lifecycle cost of AI systems, and continuously monitoring realized business value after deployment. This paper introduces the AI Value Realization Framework (AVRF), a five-gate governance model designed to support evidence-based AI investment decisions within cloud-native enterprise environments. The framework integrates three complementary analytical instruments. The AI Suitability Assessment Model (AISAM) evaluates eleven pre-investment criteria using a calibrated 0–35 scoring mechanism to determine whether a proposed business problem genuinely requires AI-based solutions. The AI Value Efficiency Ratio (AVER) measures the relationship between realized business value and a comprehensive five-layer AI cost structure, including infrastructure, data, model operations, governance, and organizational adoption costs. Finally, a continuous value realization cycle aligns governance activities with enterprise AI maturity to support ongoing performance evaluation and strategic optimization. The applicability of AVRF is examined in healthcare platform modernization and government digital transformation, where regulatory compliance, multi-tenant data isolation, transparency, and accountability significantly increase governance complexity. The study argues that organizations deploying AI without structured governance and value measurement mechanisms are likely to produce AVER values below 1.0, indicating that implementation costs exceed measurable business benefits regardless of model sophistication. The proposed framework provides a practical governance architecture for improving AI investment decisions, operational accountability, and sustainable enterprise value realization


Keywords


Enterprise AI Governance, AI Value Realization, AI Suitability Assessment, Cloud-Native Architecture, AI Finops

References


D. H. Hagos, R. Battle, and D. B. Rawat, "Recent advances in generative AI and large language models: Current status, challenges, and perspectives," IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 5873–5893, 2024.

L. H. Gutiérrez, "No One AI Fits All: Technology and Functional Complementarities in Firm-Level AI Adoption (2021--2024)," Available SSRN 6401112.

M. Menacher, "The impact of artificial intelligence engagement on the valuation of German listed companies: an explorative analysis-the impact of artificial intelligence applications areas on firms' valuation," 2025.

J. Jöhnk, M. Weißert, and K. Wyrtki, "Ready or Not, AI Comes—An Interview Study of Organizational AI Readiness Factors: J. Jöhnk et al.: Ready or Not, AI Comes: An Interview Study of Organizational AI Readiness Factors," Bus. & Inf. Syst. Eng., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 5–20, 2021.

P. Osypanka and P. Nawrocki, "Resource usage cost optimization in cloud computing using machine learning," IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2079–2089, 2020.

G. Raghavendra, R. Modak, and V. G. Avula, "Cost Optimization Strategies for AI Workloads in Multi-Cloud Environments," in 2025 International Conference on Computing Technologies & Data Communication (ICCTDC), 2025, pp. 1–5.

S. Ponnusamy and M. Khoje, "Optimizing cloud costs with machine learning: Predictive resource scaling strategies," in 2024 5th International Conference on Innovative Trends in Information Technology (ICITIIT), 2024, pp. 1–8.

M. Hassan, A. Kushniruk, and E. Borycki, "Barriers to and facilitators of artificial intelligence adoption in health care: scoping review," JMIR Hum. Factors, vol. 11, p. e48633, 2024.

A. Aristovnik, E. Murko, N. Kristl, and D. Ravšelj, "Disruptive technology capabilities in local governments: An empirical study," Inf. Polity, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 14–33, 2025.

M. K. Damarched, "Digital Transformation Strategies for Higher Education—Enterprise IT Systems," Int. J. Nov. Res. Dev., vol. 11, pp. b780–b791, 2026.

F. Gama and S. Magistretti, "Artificial intelligence in innovation management: A review of innovation capabilities and a taxonomy of AI applications," J. Prod. Innov. Manag., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 76–111, 2025.

A. Zebec and M. Indihar Štemberger, "Conceptualizing a capability-based view of artificial intelligence adoption in a BPM context," in International Conference on Business Process Management, 2020, pp. 194–205.

H. F. Hansen, E. Lillesund, P. Mikalef, and N. Altwaijry, "Understanding artificial intelligence diffusion through an AI capability maturity model," Inf. Syst. Front., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 2147–2163, 2024.

P. Mikalef and M. Gupta, "Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance," Inf. & Manag., vol. 58, no. 3, p. 103434, 2021.

R. B. Sadiq, N. Safie, A. H. Abd Rahman, and S. Goudarzi, "Artificial intelligence maturity model: a systematic literature review," PeerJ Comput. Sci., vol. 7, p. e661, 2021.

E. Papagiannidis, I. M. Enholm, C. Dremel, P. Mikalef, and J. Krogstie, "Toward AI governance: Identifying best practices and potential barriers and outcomes," Inf. Syst. Front., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 123–141, 2023.

M. A. Camilleri, "Artificial intelligence governance: Ethical considerations and implications for social responsibility," Expert Syst., vol. 41, no. 7, p. e13406, 2024.

A. Bagchi, "FinOps for AI Workloads," Next-Generation Technol. Cloud Comput. From AI Secur. to Sustain., pp. 113–128, 2026.

G. P. Rusum and S. Anasuri, "AI-Augmented Cloud Cost Optimization: Automating FinOps with Predictive Intelligence," Int. J. Artif. Intell. Data Sci. Mach. Learn., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 82–94, 2024.

A. M. Geethananda, "FinOps in Multi-Cloud AI Environments: Financial Governance Strategies For Complex Computational Workloads," J. Int. Cris. Risk Commun. Res., vol. 8, 2025.

S. N. P. Kumar, "Comprehensive AI Governance Framework: A Strategic Approach for Organizations in Dynamic Regulatory Environments," Int. J. Eng. Ext. Technol. Res., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 9653–9660, 2025.

M. Fenwick, E. P. M. Vermeulen, and M. Corrales, "Business and regulatory responses to artificial intelligence: Dynamic regulation, innovation ecosystems and the strategic management of disruptive technology," in Robotics, AI and the Future of Law, Springer, 2018, pp. 81–103.

B. N. Jørgensen and Z. G. Ma, "Impact of EU Laws and Regulations on the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Cyber--Physical Systems: A Review of Regulatory Barriers, Technological Challenges, and Cross-Sector Implications," Electronics, vol. 15, no. 10, p. 2184, 2026.

J. Y. Kim et al., "Organizational governance of emerging technologies: AI adoption in healthcare," in proceedings of the 2023 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, 2023, pp. 1396–1417.

P. Mikalef et al., "Examining how AI capabilities can foster organizational performance in public organizations," Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 40, no. 2, p. 101797, 2023.

A. M. Abd-Elwahab, A. G. Mohamed, and E. M. Shaaban, "MicroServices-driven enterprise architecture model for infrastructure optimization," Futur. Bus. J., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 90, 2023.

A. Önden, "Integrating artificial intelligence and enterprise resource planning systems: A structured review of decision support capabilities, constraints, and governance," Manag. Sci. Adv., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 172–186, 2026.

N. Iman, "The hidden costs of intelligence: artificial intelligence and machine learning adoption and the paradox of exponential digital growth," Sustain. Clim. Chang, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 225–241, 2025.

E. Karakurt and A. Akbulut, "Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Large Language Models (LLMs) for Enterprise Knowledge Management and Document Automation: A Systematic Literature Review," Appl. Sci., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 368, 2025.

J. Holmström, "From AI to digital transformation: The AI readiness framework," Bus. Horiz., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 329–339, 2022.

X. Du et al., "A blockchain-assisted intelligent edge cooperation system for IoT environments with multi-infrastructure providers," IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 24, pp. 21227–21239, 2023.

A. I. Canhoto and F. Clear, "Artificial intelligence and machine learning as business tools: A framework for diagnosing value destruction potential," Bus—Horiz., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 183–193, 2020.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v6i3.1867

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Kiran Kumar Jaghni

International Journal of Engineering, Science, and Information Technology (IJESTY) eISSN 2775-2674